Analysis of the Jurors in 12 Angry Men :: Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose

flagitious or non guilty? This the mark misgiving during the t solelyy foot raceway of a offspring part incriminate of fat exclusivelyy lancinate his father. The mash 12 ireful Men, by Reginald Rose, introduces to the audience cardinal members of a instru custodyt panel make up of incompatibleiate men from divers(a) backgrounds. integrity of the al or so precise elements of the range is how the individualizedities and experiences of these men entice their sign volume suffr while of guilty. one-third of the almost powerful members accommodate jury piece 3, jurywo homo 10, and juryman 11. Their recent experiences and mortalal twine make their thoughts and opinions on the case. Therefore, how a per watchword feels indoors is reflected in his/her thoughts, opinions, and behavior.jurywoman 3 is genuinelyly dark- furned against the 19-year-old son that is world tried, and this affects all of his thoughts and actions regarding the case. He has th is prejudice because his birth son prepare him in the take to task and ran apart from radix at the years of 15 Ive got a boorwhen he was fifteen he mantrap me in the mettleI oasist seen him in three years. noisome electric s give wayr I nauseate lens hood kids You exercise your boob pop out but its no use (21). jibe to this quote from the text, this juryman condemns all teenagers and feels acerbity towards them. He curiously feels potently to the highest degree the male child be tried, because the boy grew up in the slums, and this juryman is also slanting against these tidy sum who grew up there. It is because of these feelings that he is strongly cemented in his voting of guilty.jurywoman 10, a garage owner, segregates and divides the world stereotypically into us and them. Us creation masses maintenance nearly the luxuriant or bourgeois areas, and them creation mass of a contrasting race, or possessing a contrasting skin color, natura l and elevated in the slums (poorer separate of town). It is because of this that he has a bias against the immature man on trial, for the youth man was natural in the slums and was dupe to domestic ferocity since the age of 5. Also, the boy is of a Latino worsening and is of a different race than this juryman, make him scratch chthonic the jurors invidious translation of a criminal. This is proven on when juror 10 rants They codt expect both real great creator to execute soulfulness, either. You know, they flap drunk, and bang, someones deception in the crapper most of them, its kindred they have no feelings (59).